What is the problem size for HPCG?

HPCG guidelines state that the problem size should be large enough to occupy at least 25% of the main memory .

What is the difference between HPCG and HPL?

HPCG generates and uses sparse data structures that have a very low compute-to-data-movement ratio, especially compared to HPL . For a given problem size N, HPL performs floating point operations proportional to N*N*N operations while performing memory reads and write proportional to N*N.

What is an HPCG test?

The High Performance Conjugate Gradients (HPCG) Benchmark project is an effort to create a new metric for ranking HPC systems . HPCG is intended as a complement to the High Performance LINPACK (HPL) benchmark, currently used to rank the TOP500 computing systems.

The High Performance Conjugate Gradient (HPCG) benchmark is a simple program that generates a synthetic sparse linear system that is mathematically similar to a finite element, finite volume or finite difference discretization of a three-dimensional heat diffusion problem on a semi-regular grid.

What is the HPL benchmark?

HPL is a software package that solves a (random) dense linear system in double precision (64 bits) arithmetic on distributed-memory computers . It can thus be regarded as a portable as well as freely available implementation of the High Performance Computing Linpack Benchmark.

What is the size of my problem?

Size of the Problem is a social skills concept used to help students identify the severity of their problems which then allows them to choose an appropriate reaction . When students have a common language to describe their problems and reactions, they can identify solutions.

Which brand is best for HPL sheet? Alstone : Formica is one of the most well-known and respected brands in the laminate industry. ... Fundermax: fundermax is another prominent player in the fundermax HPL market, offering an extensive selection of high-quality laminate sheets. More items... Feb 8, 2024

It is considered one of the most durable decorative surface materials and is available with unique performance properties, including chemical, fire, and wear resistance . Special grades of HPL can be postformed around curved edges by applying heat and restraint. HPL is laminated to a panel utilizing various adhesives.

Which is better hPL or TFL?

TFL is a true value play . It's a good choice when durability isn't a major concern, and budgets are tight. When should HPL and TFL be used? HPL should be used when a durable, high-performance surface is needed.

A simple Installation guidance for HPCG(High Performance Conjugate Gradients) Install dependency. sudo apt-get install -y mpich libmpich-dev. Download HPCG. ... Generate HPCG template conffile. ... Modify Make.linux according to the text below. ... Compile HPCG. ... Modify hpcg.dat and run the HPCG.

HPL-AI stands for " the High Performance LINPACK for Accelerator Introspection " [1], which allows mixed-precision arithmetic to solve a linear equation system and seeks to highlight the convergence of HPC and artificial intelligence (AI) workloads.

What is a guardant test?

As a blood test, Guardant360 ® captures the DNA that is shed from your tumour . * This provides a comprehensive overview of your cancer genomics from both your primary tumour and any metastatic sites. Your report shows your cancer's genomic alterations detected in the blood.

What is the problem with large class sizes?

In the classroom, large enrollments can promote student disengagement and feelings of alienation , which can erode students' sense of responsibility and lead to behaviors that both reflect and promote lack of engagement. Logistics can also be a challenge when teaching a large class.

High Performance Conjugate Gradient Benchmark (2024)

HPCG is the High Performance Conjugate Gradient and is a new scientific benchmark from Sandia National Lans focused for super-computer testing with modern real-world workloads compared to HPCC.

To run this test with the Phoronix Test Suite, the basic command is: phoronix-test-suite benchmark hpcg.

Project Site

hpcg-benchmark.org

Source Repository

github.com

Test Created

26 December 2013

Last Updated

15 June 2023

Test Maintainer

Michael Larabel

Test Type

Processor

Average Install Time

12 Seconds

Average Run Time

9 Hours, 6 Minutes, 7 Seconds

Test Dependencies

C/C++ Compiler Toolchain + Fortran + OpenMPI

Accolades

150k+ Downloads

Supported Platforms

* Uploading of benchmark result data to OpenBenchmarking.org is always optional (opt-in) via the Phoronix Test Suite for users wishing to share their results publicly.
** Data based on those opting to upload their test results to OpenBenchmarking.org and users enabling the opt-in anonymous statistics reporting while running benchmarks from an Internet-connected platform.
*** Test profile page view reporting began March 2021.
Data updated weekly as of 31 July 2024.

Revision History

pts/hpcg-1.3.0 [View Source] Thu, 15 Jun 2023 17:40:04 GMT
Update parameters.

pts/hpcg-1.2.1 [View Source] Fri, 10 Jan 2020 19:09:20 GMT
Add --allow-run-as-root

pts/hpcg-1.2.0 [View Source] Fri, 10 Jan 2020 19:07:59 GMT
Update against upstream HPCG 3.1.

pts/hpcg-1.1.1 [View Source] Fri, 13 Oct 2017 17:29:18 GMT
Various cleanups

pts/hpcg-1.1.0 [View Source] Sat, 12 Aug 2017 22:16:43 GMT
Rework, update to v3.0 upstream test

pts/hpcg-1.0.2 [View Source] Mon, 03 Apr 2017 11:09:33 GMT
add -lstdc++ to LINKFLAGS

pts/hpcg-1.0.1 [View Source] Thu, 25 Aug 2016 13:53:21 GMT
Update CFLAGS handling

pts/hpcg-1.0.0 [View Source] Thu, 26 Dec 2013 00:43:12 GMT
Initial commit of HPCG - High Performance Conjugate Gradient test.

Suites Using This Test

Multi-Core

HPC - High Performance Computing

CPU Massive

MPI Benchmarks

Performance Metrics

Analyze Test Configuration:

High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1

X Y Z: 104 104 104 - RT: 60

OpenBenchmarking.org metrics for this test profile configuration based on 578 public results since 15 June 2023 with the latest data as of 26 July 2024.

Below is an overview of the generalized performance for components where there is sufficient statistically significant data based upon user-uploaded results. It is important to keep in mind particularly in the Linux/open-source space there can be vastly different OS configurations, with this overview intended to offer just general guidance as to the performance expectations.

Component

Percentile Rank

# Compatible Public Results

GFLOP/s (Average)

2 x Intel Xeon Max 9480

100th

102 ^{+/- 8}

2 x INTEL XEON PLATINUM 8592

96th

71 ^{+/- 2}

2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8490H

95th

63 ^{+/- 1}

ARMv8 Neoverse-V2 96-Core

93rd

2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8462Y

92nd

2 x AMD EPYC 9754 128-Core

90th

55 ^{+/- 5}

2 x AMD EPYC 9654 96-Core

90th

53 ^{+/- 7}

2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6444Y

88th

2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8380

87th

ARMv8 Neoverse-V2 72-Core

86th

40 ^{+/- 2}

2 x AMD EPYC 7773X 64-Core

84th

Tested CPU Architectures

This benchmark has been successfully tested on the below mentioned architectures. The CPU architectures listed is where successful OpenBenchmarking.org result uploads occurred, namely for helping to determine if a given test is compatible with various alternative CPU architectures.

CPU Architecture

Kernel Identifier

Verified On

Intel / AMD x86 64-bit

x86_64

(Many Processors)

Loongson LoongArch 64-bit

loongarch64

Loongson-3A6000

ARMv8 64-bit

aarch64

ARMv8 8-Core, ARMv8 Cortex-A72 16-Core, ARMv8 Cortex-A72 4-Core, ARMv8 Cortex-A76 4-Core, ARMv8 Neoverse-N1, ARMv8 Neoverse-N1 128-Core, ARMv8 Neoverse-N1 64-Core, ARMv8 Neoverse-V1, ARMv8 Neoverse-V1 16-Core, ARMv8 Neoverse-V1 32-Core, ARMv8 Neoverse-V1 64-Core, ARMv8 Neoverse-V2 72-Core, ARMv8 Neoverse-V2 96-Core, Apple M2

Recent Test Results

Compare

Linux 6.11 Benchmarks AMD Ryzen Threadripper Featured Kernel Comparison	6.10.0-generic - 6.10.0-061000daily20240725-generic
Phytium D3000 1 System - 22 Benchmark Results	ARMv8 - Phytium D3000 - 64GB Kylin v10 - 5.4.18-85-generic - X Server 1.20.8
AWS Graviton Benchmarks 2 Systems - 87 Benchmark Results	ARMv8 Neoverse-V2 - Amazon EC2 r8g.metal-24xl - 12 x 64GB DDR5-5600MT Ubuntu 24.04 - 6.8.0-1009-aws - GCC 13.2.0
AWS Graviton Benchmarks 1 System - 88 Benchmark Results	ARMv8 Cortex-A72 - Amazon EC2 a1.metal - 32GB Ubuntu 24.04 - 6.8.0-1009-aws - GCC 13.2.0
2021-09-09-1229 73 Systems - 527 Benchmark Results	2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 - Intel S2600CW - Intel Xeon E7 v4 Arch Linux - 6.9.7-arch1-1 - GCC 14.1.1 20240522
Memory Benchmarks 1 System - 27 Benchmark Results	Intel Core i9-14900K - ASUS PRIME Z790-P WIFI - Intel Raptor Lake-S PCH Ubuntu 24.04 - 6.8.0-31-generic - GNOME Shell 46.0
dual-epyc7551-hpcg-benchmark-204-05-19-night 1 System - 1 Benchmark Result	2 x AMD EPYC 7551 32-Core - Supermicro Super Server H11DSi-NT v2.00 - AMD 17h Ubuntu 22.04 - 6.2.0-26-generic - GNOME Shell 42.9
AMD-5700X-hpcg-benchmark-2024-05-18 1 System - 1 Benchmark Result	AMD Ryzen 7 5700X 8-Core - Gigabyte B550M AORUS ELITE - AMD Starship Ubuntu 22.04 - 6.2.0-26-generic - GNOME Shell 42.9
dual-epyc7551-hpcg-benchmark-204-05-11 1 System - 1 Benchmark Result	2 x AMD EPYC 7551 32-Core - Supermicro Super Server H11DSi-NT v2.00 - AMD 17h Ubuntu 22.04 - 6.2.0-26-generic - GNOME Shell 42.9
dual-epyc7551-hpcg-benchmark-2024-04-29 1 System - 1 Benchmark Result	2 x AMD EPYC 7551 32-Core - Supermicro Super Server H11DSi-NT v2.00 - AMD 17h Ubuntu 22.04 - 6.2.0-26-generic - GNOME Shell 42.9
dual-epyc7551-hpcg-benchmark-2024-04-28 1 System - 1 Benchmark Result	2 x AMD EPYC 7551 32-Core - Supermicro Super Server H11DSi-NT v2.00 - AMD 17h Ubuntu 22.04 - 5.15.105-0515105-generic - X Server 1.21.1.4
dual-epyc7551-hpcg-benchmark-2024-04-27-256gb 1 System - 1 Benchmark Result	2 x AMD EPYC 7551 32-Core - Supermicro H11DSi-NT v2.00 - AMD 17h Ubuntu 20.04 - 5.15.0-105-generic - X Server 1.20.13
dual-e5-2696v4-hpcg-benchmark-2024-04-26 1 System - 1 Benchmark Result	2 x Intel Xeon E5-2696 v4 - ASUS Z10PE-D16 - Intel Xeon E7 v4 Ubuntu 20.04 - 5.15.0-102-generic - GNOME Shell 3.36.9
240421_hpcg 1 System - 1 Benchmark Result	AMD Ryzen 7 2700X Eight-Core - Gigabyte B450 AORUS M - AMD 17h Pop 22.04 - 6.8.0-76060800daily20240311-generic - GNOME Shell 42.5
dual-epyc-7551-hpcg-benchmark-memory-channel-tdp-250w-cli-2024-04-10 1 System - 1 Benchmark Result	2 x AMD EPYC 7551 32-Core - Supermicro Super Server H11DSi-NT v2.00 - AMD 17h Ubuntu 22.04 - 6.5.0-26-generic - X Server 1.21.1.4

Compare

AMD EPYC 9684X 2P Genoa-X Benchmarks 12 Systems - 69 Benchmark Results	2 x AMD EPYC 9684X 96-Core - AMD Titanite_4G - AMD Device 14a4 Ubuntu 23.04 - 6.2.0-23-generic - GNOME Shell 44.0
AMD Ryzen 7000 Series ECC DRAM 2 Systems - 244 Benchmark Results	AMD Ryzen 9 7900X 12-Core - ASRockRack B650D4U-2L2T/BCM - AMD Device 14d8 Ubuntu 22.04 - 6.6.0-060600rc1daily20230913-generic - GNOME Shell 42.9
AMD Ryzen 5000 Series Linux Performance Featured Processor Comparison	AMD Ryzen 7 5800X 8-Core - ASUS ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO - AMD Starship Ubuntu 22.04 - 5.19.0-46-generic - GNOME Shell 42.5
AMD Ryzen 5000 Series Linux Performance 10 Systems - 272 Benchmark Results	AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core - ASUS ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO - AMD Starship Ubuntu 22.04 - 5.19.0-46-generic - GNOME Shell 42.5
AMD Ryzen 5000 Series Linux Performance 8 Systems - 271 Benchmark Results	AMD Ryzen 5 5600G - ASUS ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO - AMD Renoir Ubuntu 22.04 - 5.19.0-46-generic - GNOME Shell 42.5
new wed 2 Systems - 115 Benchmark Results	2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8490H - Quanta Cloud S6Q-MB-MPS - Intel Device 1bce Ubuntu 22.04 - 5.15.0-47-generic - GNOME Shell 42.4
AMD Linux CPU Benchmarks October 2023 Featured Processor Comparison	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16-Core - ASUS ROG STRIX X670E-E GAMING WIFI - AMD Device 14d8 Ubuntu 23.10 - 6.5.0-9-generic - GNOME Shell 45.0
dsd 3 Systems - 153 Benchmark Results	AMD Ryzen 5 5500U - NB01 NL5xNU - AMD Renoir Tuxedo 22.04 - 6.0.0-1010-oem - KDE Plasma 5.26.5
Framework 13 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U Linux Benchmarks 7 Systems - 223 Benchmark Results	AMD Ryzen 7 7840U - PHX Ray_PEU - AMD Device 14e8 Ubuntu 23.10 - 6.3.0-7-generic - GNOME Shell
new new 2 Systems - 191 Benchmark Results	AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme - ASUS RC71L v1.0 - AMD Device 14e8 Ubuntu 23.04 - 6.4.0-060400rc6-generic - GNOME Shell 44.2
AMD Ryzen 5000 Series Linux Performance 8 Systems - 271 Benchmark Results	AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core - ASUS ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO - AMD Starship Ubuntu 22.04 - 5.19.0-46-generic - GNOME Shell 42.5
dddas 2 Systems - 234 Benchmark Results	AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 32-Core - ASUS ROG ZENITH II EXTREME - AMD Starship Ubuntu 22.04 - 5.19.0-051900rc7-generic - GNOME Shell 42.2
dddas 2 Systems - 234 Benchmark Results	AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 32-Core - ASUS ROG ZENITH II EXTREME - AMD Starship Ubuntu 22.04 - 5.19.0-051900rc7-generic - GNOME Shell 42.2
Microsoft Azure HBv4 HPC Comparison Benchmarks 8 Systems - 95 Benchmark Results	2 x AMD EPYC 9V33X 96-Core - Microsoft Virtual Machine - 1 GB + 59 GB + 116 GB + 176 GB + 176 GB + 176 GB AlmaLinux 8.8 - 4.18.0-425.3.1.el8.x86_64 - GCC 8.5.0 20210514 + CUDA 12.1
new jult 2 Systems - 115 Benchmark Results	Intel Core i7-1185G7 - Dell 0DXP1F - Intel Tiger Lake-LP Ubuntu 22.04 - 5.19.0-40-generic - GNOME Shell 42.2

High Performance Conjugate Gradient Benchmark (2024)

Project Site

Source Repository

Test Created

Last Updated

Test Maintainer

Test Type

Average Install Time

Average Run Time

Test Dependencies

Accolades

Supported Platforms

Revision History

Suites Using This Test

Multi-Core

HPC - High Performance Computing

CPU Massive

MPI Benchmarks

Performance Metrics

High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1

X Y Z: 104 104 104 - RT: 60

Tested CPU Architectures

Recent Test Results

Compare

Linux 6.11 Benchmarks AMD Ryzen Threadripper

Phytium D3000

AWS Graviton Benchmarks

AWS Graviton Benchmarks

2021-09-09-1229

Memory Benchmarks

dual-epyc7551-hpcg-benchmark-204-05-19-night

AMD-5700X-hpcg-benchmark-2024-05-18

dual-epyc7551-hpcg-benchmark-204-05-11

dual-epyc7551-hpcg-benchmark-2024-04-29

dual-epyc7551-hpcg-benchmark-2024-04-28

dual-epyc7551-hpcg-benchmark-2024-04-27-256gb

dual-e5-2696v4-hpcg-benchmark-2024-04-26

240421_hpcg

dual-epyc-7551-hpcg-benchmark-memory-channel-tdp-250w-cli-2024-04-10

Most Popular Test Results

Compare

AMD EPYC 9684X 2P Genoa-X Benchmarks

AMD Ryzen 7000 Series ECC DRAM

AMD Ryzen 5000 Series Linux Performance

AMD Ryzen 5000 Series Linux Performance

AMD Ryzen 5000 Series Linux Performance

new wed

AMD Linux CPU Benchmarks October 2023

dsd

Framework 13 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U Linux Benchmarks

new new

AMD Ryzen 5000 Series Linux Performance

dddas

dddas

Microsoft Azure HBv4 HPC Comparison Benchmarks

new jult

FAQs

What is the problem size for HPCG? ›

What is HPL AI? ›